![]() Many people have gotten used to having a little big of extra reach with their long lenses and may not want to give that up. ![]() There are also some situations where the crop factor helps you. Full frame bodies are also more expensive. The downside is that full frame sensors and lenses are bigger than their cropped counterparts. I can use my $300 24mm f/2.8 instead of the $900 Nikkor 12-24 f/4, and the 24 is faster. Both cameras have 12 megapixels, but the individual imaging sites on the D700 are farther apart, giving you a cleaner image.įull frame sensors also give photographers more options when it comes to wide-angle work. This has a lot to do with the size of the sensor. ![]() In the real world, my D700 gives me 2 full stops of useable ISO over the D300 I can shoot at ISO6400 on the D700 where I wouldn’t shoot above ISO1600 on the D300. The D300 is widely considered to be pretty good in low light, but the D700 is much better. Take a look at the Nikon D300 and it’s full frame sibling the D700. In general, full frame sensors have better image quality across the board, but they really shine when it comes to high ISO performance. That’s all well and good, but why should you care? Sensor size is important when you’re trying to pick a camera because full frame sensors have distinct advantages and disadvantages in different situations. ![]() Full compared to what? For the sake of simplicity, when I say “full frame” I mean a sensor that’s roughly 24mm x 36mm. Some people don’t like the term “full frame” because it isn’t specific. Other manufacturers are in the same range, with Olympus being the notable exception, at 2x. Canon has three sensor sizes: full frame, 1.3x and 1.6x. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |